How to Ruin a Good Concept MamaGorgon85

MamaGorgon85

Pretty much whenever I watch a YouTube video at one point or another I get the MamaGorgon85 advertisement. I think it’s a terrible advertisement in that it isn’t effective. The point of an advertisement is to somehow convince the viewer to purchase the product or service.

I’m not going to get into a long discussion of how advertising works or why. Today I just want to examine why this particular advertisement, which is apparently considered good because of the frequent occurrences I must suffer through, is, in fact terrible.

MamaGoron85 Content

The content of the advertisement is fairly simple. A group of boys enter a house of a friend and see a sign on the wall of a room that reads MamaGorgon85. The boys gasp in astonishment and ask the friend if MamaGorgon85 actually resides here.

The boy replies in the affirmative explaining that MamaGorgon85 is his mother. The other boys declare, in incredulous disbelief that this is the gamer tag of a ruthless gamer. Mom then comes into the scene bearing treats for the boys and hopes they enjoy their stay. The commercial ends with the boys, in wonder, declaring that she seems so nice in real life.

Why MamaGorgon85 Doesn’t Work

The reason it doesn’t work is fairly simple. When they see the sign, the boys go into a long description of her prowess as a gaming god. She’s the ruthless slayer who has no mercy for anyone and rules the gaming universe. This, in the writing business, is called exposition. It’s tell, not show and that’s why the commercial fails, at least in my opinion.

We don’t have any evidence to believe that the sweet woman with the tray of goodies is a gamer other than the fact one of the boys tells us this is the case. We don’t see her playing; we do see a triple-monitor gaming setup in her room but that’s it. No trophies, no voice altering software to disguise her true nature, no gaming awards, nothing to make us believe for even the slightest moment that mom is MamaGorgon85. Even the fact that her son hasn’t disclosed this information to his friends at some point ruins the believability of the scene.

It’s this reliance on telling rather than showing that ruins the commercial entirely. I imagine that most gamers rolled their eyes, as did I, at the stupidity of the assertion.

There must be a story, a story that we believe in order for a book, a movie, or even a commercial to be effective. There is no story here and that’s the problem. It’s just exposition with no backing.

MamaGorgon85 is a Good Idea

The unfortunate part of this is that as a concept, it’s pretty good. No one knows who lurks behind a gamer tag, it could be anyone. The idea that a group of boys might stumble upon a world-class gamer in an unexpected place has merit but you have to set the scene. You have to make me believe.

Perhaps one of the boys opens the door accidently and catches her playing, her voice altered, a championship match going on. Then the son closes the door quickly and silences them, it’s supposed to be a secret. Something along those lines. Then, later, she comes into the room with a tray of cookies as the boys stare at her with googly eyes and look back and forth at each other in wonder.

Conclusion

I’m not saying my idea is the only way to make the commercial work, I’m sure others can come up with alternate scenes, I’m just saying that by not following the relatively simple structure of good writing, a good idea is mangled.

Did you find the MamaGorgon85 Ad Effective?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Tom Liberman

Give the Gift of Peloton

Peloton Commercial

As most of you probably know, there’s a Peloton commercial roiling the world and when there’s an opportunity to tell everyone they’re wrong, well, I’ll be there. You’re all wrong! Let’s take a look at the ad from my point of view.

The thirty second commercial shows a husband giving his wife a Peloton for Christmas. She soon begins a workout regime on the bike both complaining about the early mornings and the harshness of the instructor while clearly enjoying the exercise she gets as well. At the end of the commercial she tells her husband that she didn’t know how much the bike would change her life.

The complaints are largely centered around the idea that her husband gave her the bike presumably because he thought she needed to lose weight. That the man is forcing his wife to lose weight against her will in order to conform with his unreasonable standards of beauty, that she is bowing to his abusive behavior.

We can make as many speculations about his motives and her desires as we want. Maybe she wanted to lose weight and had complained to him about her size. Perhaps she wanted to gain fitness and strength. Maybe his motivation was exactly as the detractors are suggesting, all these things are possible but largely irrelevant.

The bottom line is that she got on the bike, rode, and apparently gained something from it. Perhaps it was simply to please her husband. Maybe it was to be an example of strength and fitness to her daughter who is seen cheering her mother on several times in the advertisement. Again, we don’t really know the answers to these questions. What we do know is that she wanted to ride and is happy with the results, that she thinks her life has changed for the better because of riding.

We must take her word for it. I cannot lead her life for her nor should I try. That’s the problem with everyone criticizing this ad and also with many who support it by making unprovable claims about the good intentions of the husband. Neither of their lives are ours to lead. They are adults. They make decisions about their lives.

He chose to buy the Peloton for her, we don’t know why but we must respect his decision to do so. It’s not a crime to buy someone a Peloton. She chose to ride the Peloton and we must respect her decision to do so, it’s not illegal to want to ride a Peloton.

It’s this attitude that we know better how other people should lead their lives that infuriates me. She chose to ride and that’s good enough for me, why isn’t it good enough for you?

Tom Liberman